Slavery
Control
Authority
Money
They are a
SCAM
and
we are their victims.
Reclaim Freedom
Abolish The SCAM
Let's think this out...
Who should REALLY profit from another?
Anyone?
Anyone?
Who needs whom?
What would companies be without workers?
Nonexistent?
Automated?
Who would create such a system before the system could take over to create itself?
Those so inspired to create it
or
it simply would not be.
Not because of money or position of power
but rather
for the desire of such a thing.
From need and desire
freely come
motivation, inspiration, and ingenuity.
Nonexistent?
Automated?
Who would create such a system before the system could take over to create itself?
Those so inspired to create it
or
it simply would not be.
Not because of money or position of power
but rather
for the desire of such a thing.
From need and desire
freely come
motivation, inspiration, and ingenuity.
If many agree with such a need
then together they might offer to contribute their talents to achieve the desired results
seeing that the rewards of it would be great.
These are the processes by which we grow as a people.
Never is there a need to exchange more than ideas and talents in the original plan
for the earth belongs to none and to all.
Let them that should live forever
possess it.
Until then
it is impossible for anyone
short of a belief in its illusion.
then together they might offer to contribute their talents to achieve the desired results
seeing that the rewards of it would be great.
These are the processes by which we grow as a people.
Never is there a need to exchange more than ideas and talents in the original plan
for the earth belongs to none and to all.
Let them that should live forever
possess it.
Until then
it is impossible for anyone
short of a belief in its illusion.
Everything that is IS energy.
Why should we be subjected to a lifetime of paying for it
when
when
with a little effort
we could each achieve energy independence?
The land came before mankind.
Mankind came before money.
How many people did it take
as we began to populate the vast earth
for someone to independently decide they were the owner of this thing or that
as we began to populate the vast earth
for someone to independently decide they were the owner of this thing or that
and more importantly
what factor convinced the majority of the population to believe it
committing themselves
and
future generations
to become slaves to this 'new system'
and
future generations
to become slaves to this 'new system'
by their labors
to purchase this person's goods
to purchase this person's goods
and
with what?
The original cost?
The labor of their hands and sweat of their brows.
The cost today?
The same
but
with a hitch.
The same
but
with a hitch.
The price we have paid
cannot be figured in dollars
cannot be figured in dollars
but
it can be remedied by sense.
So the real question is:
Have we any left?
it can be remedied by sense.
So the real question is:
Have we any left?
What factor was it that convinced the population that they needed a leader?
That it was a good idea to become subservient to another?
That anyone should be the rightful owner of this thing or that?
...Even another?
What convinced us that not enough of this thing was available to the population
that the population might agree to this
'new world order'
and
clamour to desire it?
All labor attached to money or government
makes you a slave to a system
with misguided motivation
dedicated to inequality and non sensitivity
rather than a valuable contributor of a common goal for the good of all.
makes you a slave to a system
with misguided motivation
dedicated to inequality and non sensitivity
rather than a valuable contributor of a common goal for the good of all.
To assume we would have nothing or be nothing without money or government
is to say we would have no need or desire strong enough to motivate us to achieve a single thing without it.
If this were so
would it really be that bad?
I mean,
at least everyone would be on the same page
would they not?
Oh
What's that you say?
It wouldn't work like that?
Precisely
because we are more than that
but we are less than we could be
because we have been reduced to a commodity
rather than a contributor.
It's really all psychological.
A matter of what we believe
and what we believe in
which doesn't seem to be ourselves.
Grow your own garden.
What's that?
You say you do not have the space, the means, the desire, or the time?
You say you do not have the space, the means, the desire, or the time?
You say you can't because there's no time because you are a slave to the system
and
all of your time is invested into earning money to pay for your things?
How many of those things are things you really need?
What caused that need
and
what could we possibly need
that the earth
or
the things upon it
cannot provide us
and
how can anyone really own such resources
without others agreeing to such a system?
what could we possibly need
that the earth
or
the things upon it
cannot provide us
and
how can anyone really own such resources
without others agreeing to such a system?
What creative thinking human would not be ingenious enough or capable enough to obtain, build, or create this important thing collectively or independently of another prior to money or government having seen the need
and
having had the forethought to have thought of it in the first place?
How long ago did we give up our ability to think critically?
How long ago did we give away our freedom to think for ourselves?
To govern ourselves?
How long ago did we relinquish that responsibility
and
at what price?
How great can the need be for such an unattainable thing
that no person could think to achieve its existence without first the others?
And
if this person is the creator of something you have not
what is it that keeps you from taking the initiative to attempt the same feat
that you too may create it so that you might have your own?
What is
entitlement
and
what entitles you
or
another
to it
once more
one more over the other?
Is it a division in ability
or
is it knowledge
or
laziness
or
perhaps a lack of ability to obtain knowledge
such as age or a mental incapacity?
Who would deny anyone of their basic needs
simply because of their inability to obtain?
The answer is a sad one
for it is
all those who allow starvation and homelessness
and you
are one of them
as am I.
It is each of us who are responsible
but we shirk that responsibility for trade
and
you better be able to trade something
or deservedly receive what you put into it-
nothing
because
unless you are earning money
you are not earning your keep
and
have no value.
But is it true?
If we are being robbed by giving away so much free stuff through taxation
then why does starvation and homelessness continue to exist while the pockets of others fill?
Is this a fair and balanced system?
Has our thinking become so ingrained
that today
we must receive something for being human?
That we cannot do a thing for another without reward
because commoderatery and compassion have no value?
That's funny.
They used to.
What changed?
and
having had the forethought to have thought of it in the first place?
How long ago did we give up our ability to think critically?
How long ago did we give away our freedom to think for ourselves?
To govern ourselves?
How long ago did we relinquish that responsibility
and
at what price?
How great can the need be for such an unattainable thing
that no person could think to achieve its existence without first the others?
And
if this person is the creator of something you have not
what is it that keeps you from taking the initiative to attempt the same feat
that you too may create it so that you might have your own?
What is
entitlement
and
what entitles you
or
another
to it
once more
one more over the other?
Is it a division in ability
or
is it knowledge
or
laziness
or
perhaps a lack of ability to obtain knowledge
such as age or a mental incapacity?
Who would deny anyone of their basic needs
simply because of their inability to obtain?
The answer is a sad one
for it is
all those who allow starvation and homelessness
and you
are one of them
as am I.
It is each of us who are responsible
but we shirk that responsibility for trade
and
you better be able to trade something
or deservedly receive what you put into it-
nothing
because
unless you are earning money
you are not earning your keep
and
have no value.
But is it true?
If we are being robbed by giving away so much free stuff through taxation
then why does starvation and homelessness continue to exist while the pockets of others fill?
Is this a fair and balanced system?
Has our thinking become so ingrained
that today
we must receive something for being human?
That we cannot do a thing for another without reward
because commoderatery and compassion have no value?
That's funny.
They used to.
What changed?
How did the first human do it and those to follow before implementing a 'system'
and
what toll has this taken on our 'humanity?'
and
what toll has this taken on our 'humanity?'
So
Is it really something YOU need
or
or
something someone ELSE needs you to need
or
just something you want?
If this thing never existed
how much would you need it
or
want for it?
or
want for it?
Enough to use your ingenuity to produce it?
Do you see?
Or
do you concede?
Can you not meet your own needs given the freedom to do so?
No human shall ever own another
except that they would be moronic enough
to collectively believe they are in need of such a hierarchy.
to collectively believe they are in need of such a hierarchy.
Is inequality dangerous or necessary?
and
for whom?
What person should go without a meal or a roof and why?
Is the person responsible for their situation or the system we have subjected ourselves to?
In the end
doesn't it all lie with us
for are we not all the creator of our own demise?
And are we not certain that without such a system we could not function?
We NEED the system.
Without it we are nothing
... Really?
What's that you say?
It didn't all go down exactly like that?
You say we were blind sighted?
That when the majority figured out
what the minority realised they could achieve
what the minority realised they could achieve
using the backs of others
evolving the system to which we all submit ourselves to today
the majority lost their ability to overrule the minority?
They are still the minority
and we remain the majority.
The slave class to the elite.
But they are greater than the common man
having earned that right
right?
Always remember
without them
you are nothing
and
with them
you will always be nothing.
SMASH U$URY!
ReplyDelete